to
demolish the argument that technology is neutral, that it's just a tool
and you can pick it up or not, and all that stuff. Technology is the embodiment
of the system of capital, if you will. The big refrain of the whole high-tech
vista is, "We empower you and we connect you." And yet, of course, people
have never been so disempowered or so isolated.
Exotic:
What is your impression of what happened in Seattle?
Zerzan:
Overall, I think it was a great step forward. I think it took virtually
everybody by surprise, including me. I was hopeful, but I didn't expect
so much dedication and such a level of militancy. I was impressed with
the dedication of the people that put up with being sprayed for hours,
and all the rest of it, when they were keeping the delegates out and keeping
the thing from happening, the willingness of people to confront the cops
and to engage the cops when they started attacking people. They didn't
just go away without a fight. And now it seems like, from what I've been
hearing, the heat is on the authorities in Seattle.
Exotic:
What was the most important message that came out of all the protests?
Zerzan:
To me, that there's a new movement here. After 30 years of really no social
movements, this is a new day. And there's a lot of people, especially
young people, who see this whole society as just really bereft and bizarre
and intolerable. I don't think that should come as a surprise, given the
reality. School children are murdering each other, the teenage suicide
rate has tripled in the past 30 years. I mean, you can go on and on. It's
right there in the paper every day, but it's just kind of ignored. But
now, I'm hoping that the real questioning of things is finally up on the
table.
Exotic:
What was the role of violence in Seattle, and what is the appropriate
role of violence in this kind of a struggle?
Zerzan:
Well first, just to quibble about the word, I don't think property damage
is violence. I think there's an important distinction. You can't be violent
against a window, in my opinion. I understand the general sense, I don't
want to make a great big semantic deal out of it, but I don't think it's
violence per say.
Exotic:
Is there a term that's more appropriate, other than violence, that you
would use?
Zerzan:
Well, "property damage" or "sabotage" or "property destruction" or "targeted
vandalism." I mean, I think they're all more valid than just violence.
A piece of wall can't feel it's been violated.
But aside
from that, it seems pretty unmistakable--and it's certainly sad, it's
certainly unfortunate, it's too bad it works this way--but that's the
kind of thing that seems to be necessary to pierce through the general
dominant stuff. I hope we get past this stage of violence, to use the
term loosely, but it seems to be, sadly or otherwise, effective in terms
of putting the issues on the table. Or another way to put it is: All the
good ideas and all the rational, polite conversations and all the peaceful
parades don't achieve that. If they did, I think society would have been
changed a long time ago.
The most spectacular
instance, I guess, is in the Unabomber case. No one would have heard of
that manifesto without the bombings. And of course that doesn't mean that
anybody I know is bombing anyone or injuring or threatening people or
anything like that, any kind of personal violence whatsoever. But I think
that you do seize the issue or make some noticeable statement if you're
willing to go to that level of going past the rules that the system lays
down, the protest as usual, the protest by the numbers stuff. That I think
will only take you so far.
Exotic:
As I understand it, you've actually visited Ted Kaczynski and corresponded
with him.
Zerzan:
Right. Yeah, I visited him three or four times in the Sacramento County
Jail in the almost two years between his arrest and sentencing.
Exotic:
Now, clearly the public perception of him is the classic mad bomber, completely
nuts. What is your impression, having actually met and talked with him?
Zerzan:
I have found Ted Kaczynski to be completely sane. His liberal death penalty
lawyers decided that the only chance to avoid his execution was to portray
him as insane, contrary to his wishes. And so they worked overtime to
give out that message. But I'm just saying, I never saw the slightest
sign that he wasn't in touch with stuff. I found him to be a very intelligent,
very direct, very tuned-in person with a sense of humor and just quite
appropriate, just very normal.
Exotic:
For years the establishment has basically prevented anyone from questioning
the global economy by saying it's a done deal, there's no sense talking
about it because nobody can stop it. But it seems to me that one of the
big things that came out of Seattle was the realization, yes, we can talk
about it.
Zerzan:
Exactly. It's the old cliche that nothing succeeds like success. We stopped
the WTO meetings, the chief of police is gone--that was an unmistakable
victory. And without that, a lot of people would still just accept that
you can't talk about it, that it's just the way it is. You can point out
everything under the sun--the ocean is dying and 50,000 other things--
and they'll say, "Well, yeah, you're right, but so what? What are you
going to do about it? Nothing's happening, there's no prospect for change."
And now there is. . .
Exotic:
What can people do in their day to day lives to fight back?
Zerzan:
That's of course the challenge. That's really the basic question, it seems
to me. But the first thing is, the essential first step, is just that
it
|